brettslaterr

According to me, there are only 3 teams who won the world cup 2 times and more.:

- Australia- 04
- India- 02
- WestIndis- 02.

__________________
electronic cigarette india

phantom005

If you study the world cup results as per matches played between teams, like the 1992 cricket world cup...there is sporting entertainment performances by various teams. Infact it even seems that new zealand should had been the 1992 world cup winner! But as cricket is viewed by global audiences and the spectators eventually play up as a social stigma in deciding the victors in cricket.
Like as in gladiator movie it says that the victor should win the crowd! If a victor then plays all by himself and still the spectator doesn't want him to play. Then whats the use battling!
So imagine martin crowe lifting the 1992 cricket world cup trophy! But the celebrations would had been only in new zealand and just the paperwork. Therefore the social stigma allowed pakistan to win with a world wide applause.
Then there are many such world cups like 1999, when south africa should had been victor! Or england should had been victor! But these team aren't!!!
So the social tantrums stigma might even match fix the latter half of each and every world cup like a wimbledon tennis event where one can't even win luckily!

phantom005

Just 20 months have passed when in 2011 india was a world cup champion. I looked at the indian team which played vs sri lanka in the final its the same team with little changes which just in the past few weeks have lost Tests vs england and ODIs vs pakistan.
So was the indian world cup victory a fluke and a tournament fixed? Indians never got a challenge from any side and won the world cup with no sport.
The present losing of the tests and ODIs seems indian cricket playing like kenyans of 1998-99.
Does indian cricket salvage any morale of being a cricket world cup winner? Or have their fans even forgotten that they had won the world cup!
I wonder why should the indian cricketeers who won the 2011 world cup ever should be given credibility of their achievement! Like in record books their names would be reckoned as world cup champion players. But indian world cup winning team was a newcomer team. And the present day the indian players who have worst performances should they rightfully be called as seniors or world cup winners!??
Sachin tendulkar might had been just a 'volunteer participatory chief guest' at the 2011 cricket world cup! LOL